Canned Tuna vs. Chicken Leg

Nutrition comparison of Canned Tuna and Chicken Leg


Ever wonder how your favorite foods stack up against each other in terms of nutrition?

We compared the nutritional contents of canned tuna versus chicken leg (100g each) below using 2020 USDA and NIH data[1].

For a quick recap of significant nutrients and differences in canned tuna and chicken leg:

  • Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in calories, potassium and protein.
  • Canned tuna has 55% less cholesterol than chicken leg.
  • Canned tuna has signficantly less saturated fat than chicken leg.
  • Chicken leg has more thiamin, riboflavin and pantothenic acid, however, canned tuna contains more Vitamin B12.
Detailed nutritional comparison of canned tuna and chicken leg is analyzed below. You can also visualize the nutritional comparison for a custom portion or serving size and see how the nutrition compares.

USDA sources for nutritional information: Canned Tuna (Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids) and Chicken Leg (Chicken, broilers or fryers, leg, meat and skin, raw) . Have a correction or suggestions? Shoot us an email.


Calories and Carbs

calories

Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in calories. Chicken leg has 67% more calories than canned tuna - canned tuna has 128 calories per 100 grams and chicken leg has 214 calories.

For macronutrient ratios, canned tuna is much heavier in protein, much lighter in fat and similar to chicken leg for carbs. Canned tuna has a macronutrient ratio of 78:0:22 and for chicken leg, 31:0:69 for protein, carbohydrates and fat from calories.

Macro Ratios from Calories:

Canned Tuna Chicken Leg
Protein 78% 31%
Carbohydrates ~ ~
Fat 22% 69%
Alcohol ~ ~

carbohydrates

Both chicken leg and canned tuna are low in carbohydrates - chicken leg has 0.17g of total carbs per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

Protein

protein

Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in protein. Canned tuna has 44% more protein than chicken leg - canned tuna has 23.6g of protein per 100 grams and chicken leg has 16.4g of protein.

Fat

saturated fat

Canned tuna has signficantly less saturated fat than chicken leg - canned tuna has 0.79g of saturated fat per 100 grams and chicken leg has 4.4g of saturated fat.

trans fat

Both chicken leg and canned tuna are low in trans fat - chicken leg has 0.06g of trans fat per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

cholesterol

Canned tuna has 55% less cholesterol than chicken leg - canned tuna has 42mg of cholesterol per 100 grams and chicken leg has 93mg of cholesterol.

Vitamins

Vitamin C

Chicken leg and canned tuna contain similar amounts of Vitamin C - chicken leg has 0.2mg of Vitamin C per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin A

Chicken leg has 367% more Vitamin A than canned tuna - canned tuna has 6ug of Vitamin A per 100 grams and chicken leg has 28ug of Vitamin A.

Vitamin D

Chicken leg and canned tuna contain similar amounts of Vitamin D - chicken leg has 2iu of Vitamin D per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin E

Chicken leg and canned tuna contain similar amounts of Vitamin E - chicken leg has 0.22mg of Vitamin E per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin K

Chicken leg and canned tuna contain similar amounts of Vitamin K - chicken leg has 2.3ug of Vitamin K per 100 grams and canned tuna does not contain significant amounts.

The B Vitamins

Chicken leg has more thiamin, riboflavin and pantothenic acid, however, canned tuna contains more Vitamin B12. Both canned tuna and chicken leg contain significant amounts of niacin, Vitamin B6 and folate.

Canned Tuna Chicken Leg
Thiamin 0.008 MG 0.073 MG
Riboflavin 0.044 MG 0.141 MG
Niacin 5.799 MG 4.733 MG
Pantothenic acid 0.124 MG 0.994 MG
Vitamin B6 0.217 MG 0.318 MG
Folate 2 UG 4 UG
Vitamin B12 1.17 UG 0.56 UG

Minerals

calcium

Canned tuna and chicken leg contain similar amounts of calcium - canned tuna has 14mg of calcium per 100 grams and chicken leg has 9mg of calcium.

iron

Canned tuna and chicken leg contain similar amounts of iron - canned tuna has 0.97mg of iron per 100 grams and chicken leg has 0.69mg of iron.

potassium

Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in potassium. Canned tuna has 17% more potassium than chicken leg - canned tuna has 237mg of potassium per 100 grams and chicken leg has 203mg of potassium.

Omega-3 and Omega-6

omega 3s

For omega-3 fatty acids, chicken leg has more alpha linoleic acid (ALA) than canned tuna per 100 grams, however, canned tuna contains more dha and epa than chicken leg per 100 grams. Both canned tuna and chicken leg contain significant amounts of DPA.

Canned Tuna Chicken Leg
alpha linoleic acid 0.071 G 0.155 G
DHA 0.629 G 0.01 G
EPA 0.233 G 0.004 G
DPA 0.018 G 0.012 G
Total 0.951 G 0.181 G

omega 6s

Comparing omega-6 fatty acids, chicken leg has more linoleic acid than canned tuna per 100 grams.

Canned Tuna Chicken Leg
linoleic acid 0.055 G 2.987 G
other omega 6 ~ 0.016 G
Total 0.055 G 3.003 G



Customize your serving size


The comparison below is by common portions, e.g. cups, packages. You can also see a more concrete comparison by weight at equal weight (by grams) comparison.

Note: The specific food items compared are: Canned Tuna (Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids) and Chicken Leg (Chicken, broilers or fryers, leg, meat and skin, raw) .

Canned Tuna g

()
Daily Values (%)

Chicken Leg g

()
KCAL %
calories
KCAL %
G %
carbohydrates
G %
G %
dietary fiber
G %
G sugar G
G %
total fat
G %
G %
saturated fat
G %
G monounsaturated fat G
G polyunsaturated fat G
G trans fat G
MG cholesterol MG
MG %
sodium
MG %
Vitamins and Minerals
UG %
Vitamin A
UG %
MG %
Vitamin C
MG %
IU %
Vitamin D
IU %
MG %
calcium
MG %
MG %
iron
MG %
MG %
magnesium
MG %
MG %
potassium
MG %
MG %
thiamin (Vit B1)
MG %
MG %
riboflavin (Vit B2)
MG %
MG %
niacin (Vit B3)
MG %
MG %
Vitamin B6
MG %
MG %
pantothenic acid (Vit B5)
MG %
UG %
folate (Vit B9)
UG %
UG %
Vitamin B12
UG %
MG %
Vitamin E
MG %
UG %
Vitamin K
UG %
G %
protein
G %
UG %
biotin (Vit B7)
UG %
MG %
choline
MG %
MG %
chlorine
MG %
UG %
chromium
UG %
MG %
copper
MG %
UG %
fluoride
UG %
UG %
iodine
UG %
MG %
manganese
MG %
UG %
molybdenum
UG %
MG %
phosphorus
MG %
UG %
selenium
UG %
MG %
zinc
MG %
G Water G
G Starch G
G Alcohol G


FAQ

Does canned tuna or chicken leg contain more calories in 100 grams?
Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in calories. Chicken leg has 70% more calories than canned tuna - canned tuna has 128 calories in 100g and chicken leg has 214 calories.

Is canned tuna or chicken leg better for protein?
Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in protein. Canned tuna has 40% more protein than chicken leg - canned tuna has 23.6g of protein per 100 grams and chicken leg has 16.4g of protein.

Does canned tuna or chicken leg contain more potassium?
Both canned tuna and chicken leg are high in potassium. Canned tuna has 20% more potassium than chicken leg - canned tuna has 237mg of potassium in 100 grams and chicken leg has 203mg of potassium.