Pork vs. Cocoa Powder

Nutrition comparison of Cooked Pork and Cocoa Powder


Ever wonder how your favorite foods stack up against each other in terms of nutrition?

We compared the nutritional contents of cooked pork versus cocoa powder (100g each) below using 2020 USDA and NIH data[1].

For a quick recap of significant nutrients and differences in pork and cocoa powder:

  • Both pork and cocoa powder are high in calories, potassium, protein and saturated fat.
  • Cocoa powder is an excellent source of calcium, dietary fiber and iron.
  • Pork has more thiamin, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B12, however, cocoa powder contains more folate.
Detailed nutritional comparison of pork and cocoa powder is analyzed below. You can also visualize the nutritional comparison for a custom portion or serving size and see how the nutrition compares.

USDA sources for nutritional information: Pork (Pork, fresh, ground, cooked) and Cocoa Powder (Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened) . Have a correction or suggestions? Shoot us an email.


Image of Pork src
Image of Cocoa Powder src

Calories and Carbs

calories

Both pork and cocoa powder are high in calories. Pork has 30% more calories than cocoa powder - pork has 297 calories per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 228 calories.

For macronutrient ratios, pork is heavier in protein, much lighter in carbs and much heavier in fat compared to cocoa powder per calorie. Pork has a macronutrient ratio of 36:0:65 and for cocoa powder, 19:54:27 for protein, carbohydrates and fat from calories.

Macro Ratios from Calories:

Pork Cocoa Powder
Protein 36% 19%
Carbohydrates ~ 54%
Fat 65% 27%
Alcohol ~ ~

carbohydrates

Cocoa powder is high in carbohydrates and pork has less carbohydrates than cocoa powder - cocoa powder has 57.9g of total carbs per 100 grams and pork does not contain significant amounts.

dietary fiber

Cocoa powder is an excellent source of dietary fiber and it has more dietary fiber than pork - cocoa powder has 37g of dietary fiber per 100 grams and pork does not contain significant amounts.

sugar

Pork has less sugar than cocoa powder - cocoa powder has 1.8g of sugar per 100 grams and pork does not contain significant amounts.

Protein

protein

Both pork and cocoa powder are high in protein. Pork has 31% more protein than cocoa powder - pork has 25.7g of protein per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 19.6g of protein.

Fat

saturated fat

Both pork and cocoa powder are high in saturated fat. Pork is very similar to pork for saturated fat - pork has 7.7g of saturated fat per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 8.1g of saturated fat.

cholesterol

Cocoa powder has less cholesterol than pork - pork has 94mg of cholesterol per 100 grams and cocoa powder does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamins

Vitamin C

Pork has more Vitamin C than cocoa powder - pork has 0.7mg of Vitamin C per 100 grams and cocoa powder does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin A

Pork and cocoa powder contain similar amounts of Vitamin A - pork has 2ug of Vitamin A per 100 grams and cocoa powder does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin D

Pork has more Vitamin D than cocoa powder - pork has 21iu of Vitamin D per 100 grams and cocoa powder does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin E

Pork and cocoa powder contain similar amounts of Vitamin E - pork has 0.21mg of Vitamin E per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 0.1mg of Vitamin E.

Vitamin K

Cocoa powder and pork contain similar amounts of Vitamin K - cocoa powder has 2.5ug of Vitamin K per 100 grams and pork does not contain significant amounts.

The B Vitamins

Pork has more thiamin, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B12, however, cocoa powder contains more folate. Both pork and cocoa powder contain significant amounts of riboflavin, niacin and pantothenic acid.

Pork Cocoa Powder
Thiamin 0.706 MG 0.078 MG
Riboflavin 0.22 MG 0.241 MG
Niacin 4.206 MG 2.185 MG
Pantothenic acid 0.52 MG 0.254 MG
Vitamin B6 0.391 MG 0.118 MG
Folate 6 UG 32 UG
Vitamin B12 0.54 UG ~

Minerals

calcium

Cocoa powder is an excellent source of calcium and it has 482% more calcium than pork - pork has 22mg of calcium per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 128mg of calcium.

iron

Cocoa powder is an excellent source of iron and it has 974% more iron than pork - pork has 1.3mg of iron per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 13.9mg of iron.

potassium

Both pork and cocoa powder are high in potassium. Cocoa powder has 321% more potassium than pork - pork has 362mg of potassium per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 1524mg of potassium.

Omega-3 and Omega-6

omega 6s

Comparing omega-6 fatty acids, pork has more linoleic acid than cocoa powder per 100 grams.

Pork Cocoa Powder
linoleic acid 1.64 G 0.44 G
other omega 6 0.08 G ~
Total 1.72 G 0.44 G



Customize your serving size


The comparison below is by common portions, e.g. cups, packages. You can also see a more concrete comparison by weight at equal weight (by grams) comparison.

Note: The specific food items compared are: Pork (Pork, fresh, ground, cooked) and Cocoa Powder (Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened) .

Cooked Pork g

()
Daily Values (%)

Cocoa Powder g

()
KCAL %
calories
KCAL %
G %
carbohydrates
G %
G %
dietary fiber
G %
G sugar G
G %
total fat
G %
G %
saturated fat
G %
G monounsaturated fat G
G polyunsaturated fat G
G trans fat G
MG cholesterol MG
MG %
sodium
MG %
Vitamins and Minerals
UG %
Vitamin A
UG %
MG %
Vitamin C
MG %
IU %
Vitamin D
IU %
MG %
calcium
MG %
MG %
iron
MG %
MG %
magnesium
MG %
MG %
potassium
MG %
MG %
thiamin (Vit B1)
MG %
MG %
riboflavin (Vit B2)
MG %
MG %
niacin (Vit B3)
MG %
MG %
Vitamin B6
MG %
MG %
pantothenic acid (Vit B5)
MG %
UG %
folate (Vit B9)
UG %
UG %
Vitamin B12
UG %
MG %
Vitamin E
MG %
UG %
Vitamin K
UG %
G %
protein
G %
UG %
biotin (Vit B7)
UG %
MG %
choline
MG %
MG %
chlorine
MG %
UG %
chromium
UG %
MG %
copper
MG %
UG %
fluoride
UG %
UG %
iodine
UG %
MG %
manganese
MG %
UG %
molybdenum
UG %
MG %
phosphorus
MG %
UG %
selenium
UG %
MG %
zinc
MG %
G Water G
G Starch G
G Alcohol G


FAQ

Does pork or cocoa powder contain more calories in 100 grams?
Both pork and cocoa powder are high in calories. Pork has 30% more calories than cocoa powder - pork has 297 calories in 100g and cocoa powder has 228 calories.

Is pork or cocoa powder better for protein?
Both pork and cocoa powder are high in protein. Pork has 30% more protein than cocoa powder - pork has 25.7g of protein per 100 grams and cocoa powder has 19.6g of protein.

Does cocoa powder or pork have more carbohydrates?
By weight, cocoa powder is high in carbohydrates and pork has fewer carbohydrates than cocoa powder - cocoa powder has 57.9g of carbs for 100g and pork has no carbs..

Does pork or cocoa powder contain more calcium?
Cocoa powder is a rich source of calcium and it has 480% more calcium than pork - pork has 22mg of calcium in 100 grams and cocoa powder has 128mg of calcium.

Does pork or cocoa powder contain more iron?
Cocoa powder is an abundant source of iron and it has 970% more iron than pork - pork has 1.3mg of iron in 100 grams and cocoa powder has 13.9mg of iron.

Does pork or cocoa powder contain more potassium?
Both pork and cocoa powder are high in potassium. Cocoa powder has 320% more potassium than pork - pork has 362mg of potassium in 100 grams and cocoa powder has 1524mg of potassium.