Shortening vs. Lamb

Nutrition comparison of Shortening and Cooked Lamb


Ever wonder how your favorite foods stack up against each other in terms of nutrition?

We compared the nutritional contents of shortening versus cooked lamb (100g each) below using 2020 USDA and NIH data[1].

For a quick recap of significant nutrients and differences in shortening and lamb:

  • Both lamb and shortening are high in calories and saturated fat.
  • Lamb has more thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, Vitamin B6, folate and Vitamin B12.
  • Lamb has signficantly more iron than shortening.
  • Lamb is an excellent source of potassium and protein.
  • Shortening has signficantly more Vitamin E than lamb.
Detailed nutritional comparison of shortening and lamb is analyzed below. You can also visualize the nutritional comparison for a custom portion or serving size and see how the nutrition compares.

USDA sources for nutritional information: Shortening (Shortening, vegetable, household, composite) and Lamb (Lamb, ground, cooked, broiled) . Have a correction or suggestions? Shoot us an email.


Calories and Carbs

calories

Both lamb and shortening are high in calories. Shortening has 212% more calories than lamb - lamb has 283 calories per 100 grams and shortening has 884 calories.

For macronutrient ratios, shortening is much lighter in protein, much heavier in fat and similar to lamb for carbs. Shortening has a macronutrient ratio of 0:0:100 and for lamb, 36:0:64 for protein, carbohydrates and fat from calories.

Macro Ratios from Calories:

Shortening Lamb
Protein ~ 36%
Carbohydrates ~ ~
Fat 100% 64%
Alcohol ~ ~

Protein

protein

Lamb is an excellent source of protein and it has more protein than shortening - lamb has 24.8g of protein per 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.

Fat

saturated fat

Both lamb and shortening are high in saturated fat. Shortening has 208% more saturated fat than lamb - lamb has 8.1g of saturated fat per 100 grams and shortening has 25g of saturated fat.

trans fat

Shortening is high in trans fat and lamb has less trans fat than shortening - shortening has 13.2g of trans fat per 100 grams and lamb does not contain significant amounts.

cholesterol

Shortening has less cholesterol than lamb - lamb has 97mg of cholesterol per 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamins

Vitamin D

Lamb and shortening contain similar amounts of Vitamin D - lamb has 2iu of Vitamin D per 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.

Vitamin E

Shortening has signficantly more Vitamin E than lamb - lamb has 0.14mg of Vitamin E per 100 grams and shortening has 6.1mg of Vitamin E.

Vitamin K

Shortening has 904% more Vitamin K than lamb - lamb has 5.3ug of Vitamin K per 100 grams and shortening has 53.2ug of Vitamin K.

The B Vitamins

Lamb has more thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, Vitamin B6, folate and Vitamin B12. Both shortening and lamb contain significant amounts of pantothenic acid.

Shortening Lamb
Thiamin 0.02 MG 0.1 MG
Riboflavin ~ 0.25 MG
Niacin ~ 6.7 MG
Pantothenic acid 0.68 MG 0.66 MG
Vitamin B6 0.001 MG 0.14 MG
Folate ~ 19 UG
Vitamin B12 ~ 2.61 UG

Minerals

calcium

Lamb has 21 times more calcium than shortening - lamb has 22mg of calcium per 100 grams and shortening has 1mg of calcium.

iron

Lamb has signficantly more iron than shortening - lamb has 1.8mg of iron per 100 grams and shortening has 0.07mg of iron.

potassium

Lamb is an excellent source of potassium and it has more potassium than shortening - lamb has 339mg of potassium per 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.

Omega-3 and Omega-6

omega 3s

For omega-3 fatty acids, shortening has more alpha linoleic acid (ALA) than lamb per 100 grams.

Shortening Lamb
alpha linoleic acid 1.883 G 0.26 G
Total 1.883 G 0.26 G

omega 6s

Comparing omega-6 fatty acids, shortening has more linoleic acid than lamb per 100 grams.

Shortening Lamb
other omega 6 ~ 0.07 G
linoleic acid 26.213 G 1.07 G
Total 26.213 G 1.14 G



Customize your serving size


The comparison below is by common portions, e.g. cups, packages. You can also see a more concrete comparison by weight at equal weight (by grams) comparison.

Note: The specific food items compared are: Shortening (Shortening, vegetable, household, composite) and Lamb (Lamb, ground, cooked, broiled) .

Shortening g

()
Daily Values (%)

Cooked Lamb g

()
KCAL %
calories
KCAL %
G %
carbohydrates
G %
G %
dietary fiber
G %
G sugar G
G %
total fat
G %
G %
saturated fat
G %
G monounsaturated fat G
G polyunsaturated fat G
G trans fat G
MG cholesterol MG
MG %
sodium
MG %
Vitamins and Minerals
UG %
Vitamin A
UG %
MG %
Vitamin C
MG %
IU %
Vitamin D
IU %
MG %
calcium
MG %
MG %
iron
MG %
MG %
magnesium
MG %
MG %
potassium
MG %
MG %
thiamin (Vit B1)
MG %
MG %
riboflavin (Vit B2)
MG %
MG %
niacin (Vit B3)
MG %
MG %
Vitamin B6
MG %
MG %
pantothenic acid (Vit B5)
MG %
UG %
folate (Vit B9)
UG %
UG %
Vitamin B12
UG %
MG %
Vitamin E
MG %
UG %
Vitamin K
UG %
G %
protein
G %
UG %
biotin (Vit B7)
UG %
MG %
choline
MG %
MG %
chlorine
MG %
UG %
chromium
UG %
MG %
copper
MG %
UG %
fluoride
UG %
UG %
iodine
UG %
MG %
manganese
MG %
UG %
molybdenum
UG %
MG %
phosphorus
MG %
UG %
selenium
UG %
MG %
zinc
MG %
G Water G
G Starch G
G Alcohol G


FAQ

Does lamb or shortening contain more calories in 100 grams?
Both lamb and shortening are high in calories. Shortening has 210% more calories than lamb - lamb has 283 calories in 100g and shortening has 884 calories.

Is lamb or shortening better for protein?
Lamb is a fantastic source of protein and it has more protein than shortening - lamb has 24.8g of protein per 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.

Does lamb or shortening contain more potassium?
Lamb is a rich source of potassium and it has more potassium than shortening - lamb has 339mg of potassium in 100 grams and shortening does not contain significant amounts.